Caregiver Guidance
Introduction: Wanting to Keep Our Loved Ones Safe
When someone assumes the care of another person, their world becomes filled with a bit more worry and anxiety. Especially for the relatives of those affected by Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, or other neurological conditions, every “Where are they?” turns into a new panic and an all-too-familiar fear. What everyone wants is simple: to know their loved ones are safe. This is where technological tracking systems enter our lives; sometimes bringing hope, sometimes raising new questions. But how reliable are these systems? Can they truly bring us peace of mind? As we search for the answer to this question, let’s listen both to the science and to our hearts.
What Are Tracking Systems? For Whom and Why?
The traditional idea of “tracking” means protecting someone with our eyes, our voices, even our instincts. Today, however, technological tracking systems can make it somewhat easier to be prepared for wandering, getting lost, risky behaviors, or sudden crises—especially in the advanced stages of diseases. These systems include GPS-based smart bracelets, smartphone-integrated applications, and even sensors that detect movement inside the house or in its vicinity.
Alzheimer’s and Dementia: High risk of wandering, getting lost, and aimless roaming due to forgetfulness.
Parkinson’s: Sudden freezing, falls, or situations requiring emergency medical attention can occur.
Chronic Neurological Conditions: Physical and cognitive impairments increase the need for tracking.
While all these may ease life for both your loved one and you as a caregiver, the answer to “Can I use this safely and with peace of mind?” is not limited to just the device’s technical features.
How Is Reliability Measured?
When we talk about reliability in technological tracking systems, there are a few main topics to consider:
Data Consistency and Accuracy
Device Durability and Ease of Use
Privacy and Data Security
Performance in Emergencies
User Feedback and Scientific Evidence
Let’s assess them one by one.
1. Data Accuracy and Consistency: Really by Our Side at All Times?
GPS-based tracking devices can determine location with up to 90% accuracy in urban and open areas (Source: Alzheimer’s Association, 2022). However, this rate drops in enclosed spaces, multi-story buildings, or places with signal blockers. GPS data from satellites can sometimes lead to deviations of several hundred meters. On the other hand, systems relying on Wi-Fi and cellular data can also experience interruptions from time to time. Therefore, instead of relying purely on a single technology, integrating it with other supportive methods may be safer.
“For the first time, I could go shopping in peace thanks to the location notifications from my dad’s bracelet. But the device didn’t work in the building’s basement... Then I realized I can’t always get answers from technology.”
— Gözde, daughter of an Alzheimer’s patient
2. Device Durability and Ease of Use
Many older adults have difficulty adapting to technology. The device’s battery life, how easily it can be worn on the wrist or neck, whether it’s lightweight, and whether it can be accidentally removed all matter greatly. Durable and waterproof products stand out.
Some devices can operate continuously for 24-48 hours; charging requirements must align with your care routine.
Bracelets need special design to prevent falling off, improper wearing, or being removed during sleep at night, for example.
As the caregiver, you need easy access to the app, timely notifications, and an easy device management process.
Scientific studies show that the more “elderly-friendly” the technology, the more effective the device. User training (both for the patient and you) increases success.
3. Privacy: The Notion of Monitoring and Consent
While trying to protect our loved ones, we can sometimes inadvertently cross boundaries of privacy. Who can access which information? Who will see the monitoring data? Especially if the patient is still able to make decisions, tracking without their consent is ethically problematic. In many countries including the European Union, privacy of location and health data is strictly regulated (like GDPR).
Scientific data show that, when privacy is violated, patients can develop anxiety, distrust, and depression. Many experts recommend openly discussing ethical boundaries before device use and obtaining written consent from the patient/family.
4. Emergencies: Is That “One Click” Really Enough?
Some technological tracking systems not only provide location notifications but also can have features like an emergency button, fall detection, or exit alerts for certain areas. However, what happens if the person can’t move or press the button in a real emergency? At this point, automatic alert capabilities and a rapid-response support network are extremely important.
Some systems automatically send notifications to caregivers and even emergency services if a fall is detected.
False alarms, on the other hand, can lead to intense anxiety. There are data suggesting such devices have a 15–30% false alarm rate.
So, as good as the system is, the importance of human support remains just as great. Technology alone isn’t the solution; it’s a supportive tool.
5. User Feedback and Evidence-Based Studies
Some recent studies report that over 70% of caregivers state that tracking technologies “significantly increase their perceived level of safety” (National Institute on Aging, 2021). However, these same studies also frequently report emotional fatigue, stress caused by excessive alerts, and technical malfunctions. While devices may ease life in one sense, they can also introduce a new layer of responsibility.
Using designs centered around user experience today, as well as providing written and phone support, helps reduce caregiver anxiety. Also, maintaining empathic communication with the patient who uses the device can facilitate their participation in the process.
Psychological Effects: Peace of Mind or a New Source of Anxiety?
Tracking systems offer caregivers the comfort of being “informed at all times,” but can also create new kinds of stress:
Experiencing unnecessary worry due to irregular or false notifications
An “obsession” with constantly checking the technology
A decrease in the sense of privacy for both sides
Returning to old fears in the event of a technical failure
Still, let’s not forget: No system can replace the attention and love that comes from within a person. Technology is never a guarantee of compassion or inner peace. Yet, at times when you cannot keep your eyes on your loved one, it can become a small support. This is why accepting your feelings and finding balance is so vital.
Practical Tips for Success
Get to Know the Technology: Test your device’s advantages, limits, and how it works. After reading the manual, do a trial week.
Have a Backup Plan: Devices or apps can malfunction, batteries can die. Always have a “Plan B” (such as neighbor support, a phone tree, etc.) ready.
Prioritize Communication with the Patient: Respect their feelings and privacy, explain things, and encourage them to participate.
Use Notification Settings Wisely: Carefully adjust intervals and area alerts so they don’t cause you unnecessary stress or excessive interference in your life.
Connect with Support Communities: Listening to the experiences of other caregivers and knowing you’re not alone can be reassuring.
Show Yourself Compassion Too: Remember, even the most advanced technology cannot lighten your load on its own. When your sense of loneliness grows, seek professional support.
Conclusion: Technology Is by Our Side, But Not the Only Solution
No system yet provides a completely safe and “humanless” level of tracking. Still, the continually advancing face of technology helps ease caregivers’ burdens and strengthens our sense of safety. The true safety of our loved ones heading out with a smart bracelet or app doesn’t depend on a technical device alone—it’s shaped by your mutual love, trust, and shared decisions.
Remember, no device is as unique as the attention and patience you provide. See technological tracking systems as a tool, not an end. And most importantly, don’t neglect to listen to yourself, your feelings, and your concerns.
Resources
Alzheimer's Association. (2022). Safety and memory loss: GPS tracking – Understanding the limitations.
National Institute on Aging. (2021). Technology that helps caregivers.
European Union GDPR. (2018). General Data Protection Regulation and health data privacy.
Bamford, C., & Bruce, E. (2000). Successes and challenges in using GPS for people with dementia.
Bir Sonraki Okuma
